Search Database

KT Strategies - Search Results

You searched for records matching:

1. Citation: Bertone, M. P., Meessen, B., Clarysse, G., Hercot, D., Kelley, A., Kafando, Y., Lange, I., Pfaffmann, J., Ridde, V., Sieleunou, I., & Witter, S. (2013). Assessing communities of practice in health policy: a conceptual framework as a first step towards empirical research.  Health Research Policy and Systems, 11(39). doi:10.1186/1478-4505-11-39
Title: Assessing communities of practice in health policy: a conceptual framework as a first step towards empirical research
Author(s): Bertone, M. P.
Meessen, B.
Clarysse, G.
Hercot, D.
Kelley, A.
Kafando, Y.
Lange, I.
Pfaffmann, J.
Ridde, V.
Sieleunou, I.
Witter, S.
Year: 2013
Journal/Publication: Health Research Policy Systems
Abstract:

Communities of Practice (CoPs) are groups of people that interact regularly to deepen their knowledge on a specific topic. Thanks to information and communication technologies, CoPs can involve experts distributed across countries and adopt a ‘transnational’ membership. This has allowed the strategy to be applied to domains of knowledge such as health policy with a global perspective. CoPs represent a potentially valuable tool for producing and sharing explicit knowledge, as well as tacit knowledge and implementation practices. They may also be effective in creating links among the different ‘knowledge holders’ contributing to health policy (e.g., researchers, policymakers, technical assistants, practitioners, etc.).

CoPs in global health are growing in number and activities. As a result, there is an increasing need to document their progress and evaluate their effectiveness. This paper represents a first step towards such empirical research as it aims to provide a conceptual framework for the analysis and assessment of transnational CoPs in health policy.

The framework is developed based on the findings of a literature review as well as on our experience, and reflects the specific features and challenges of transnational CoPs in health policy. It organizes the key elements of CoPs into a logical flow that links available resources and the capacity to mobilize them, with knowledge management activities and the expansion of knowledge, with changes in policy and practice and, ultimately, with an improvement in health outcomes. Additionally, the paper addresses the challenges in the operationalization and empirical application of the framework.

Keywords:

Communities of practice; Evaluation; Health policy; Knowledge management; Knowledge translation

Copyright © (2013) Bertone, M. et al. Abstract reprinted by AIR in compliance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Unported license at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ .

WEB URI:

http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/11/1/39

http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/pdf/1478-4505-11-39.pdf

Type of Item: Measurement Instrument
Type of KT Strategy: Community of Practice
Target Group: Research Funders
Researchers
Evidence Level: 2
Record Updated:2013-11-04
 

Home or Search again

American Institutes for Research (AIR) logo
About AIR | AIR Topics | Contact AIR
Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research (KTDRR)
© 2019 American Institutes for Research (AIR).

The contents of this site were developed under grant number 90DPKT0001 from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.


the National Institute on Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research logo