Search Database

KT Strategies - Search Results

You searched for records matching:

1. Citation: Estabrooks, C., Goel, V., Thiel, E., Pinfold, P. Sawka, C., & Williams, I. (2013). Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 6(3), 170-182.
Title: Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review
Author(s): Estabrooks, C.
Goel, V.
Thiel, E.
Pinfold, P.
Sawka, C.
Williams, I
Year: 2013
Journal/Publication: Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
Abstract: This systematic review focuses on articles with outcomes influenced by consumer decision aids (CDAs).  Participants included were primarily decision-makers and health consumers. Over 500 titles and abstracts were identified using an augmented version of O'Conner et al. (1997). No specific study design was used as a selection criteria.  A final 12 studies were synthesized after meeting all exclusionary criteria and results indicated that with exception to vaccination, decision aids did not appear to influence actual treatment or screening decisions.

Type of Item: Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis
Type of KT Strategy: Decision Aids
Target Group: Decision Maker
Healthcare Professional
Evidence Level: 5
Record Updated:2015-01-08

Home or Search again

American Institutes for Research (AIR) logo
About AIR | AIR Topics | Contact AIR
Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research (KTDRR)
© 2019 American Institutes for Research (AIR).

The contents of this site were developed under grant number 90DPKT0001 from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

the National Institute on Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research logo