Search Database

KT Strategies Database - Search Results

You searched for records matching:

1. Citation: Gagliardi, A. R., Brouwers, M. C., & Bhattacharyya, O. K. (2014). A framework of the desirable features of guideline implementation tools (GItools): Delphi survey and assessment of GItools. Implementation Science, 9(98). doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0098-8.
Title: A framework of the desirable features of guideline implementation tools (GItools): Delphi survey and assessment of GItools
Author(s): Gagliardi, A. R.
Brouwers, M. C.
Bhattacharyya, O. K.
Year: 2014
Journal/Publication: Implementation Science
Abstract:

Background

Guidelines are the foundation for healthcare planning, delivery and quality improvement but are not consistently implemented. Few guidelines are accompanied by guideline implementation tools (GItools). Users have requested GItools, and developers have requested guidance on how to develop GItools. First it is necessary to characterize GItools. The purpose of this research was to generate a framework of desirable features of GItools.

Methods

Items representing desirable GItool features were generated by a cross-sectional survey of the international guideline community. Items were confirmed by 31 guideline developers, implementers and researchers in a two-round Delphi survey administered on the Internet. The resulting GItool framework was applied with a sample of GItools accompanying guidelines identified in the National Guideline Clearinghouse.

Results

The cross-sectional survey was completed by 96 respondents from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, The Netherlands, and various other countries. Seven of nine items were rated by the majority as desirable. A total of 31 panelists from 10 countries including Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States took part in a two-round Delphi survey. Ten items achieved consensus as desirable GItool features in round #1, and two additional items in round #2. A total of 13 GItools for Resource Planning, Implementation and Evaluation were identified among 149 guidelines on a variety of clinical topics (8.7%). Many GItools did not possess features considered desirable.

Conclusions

Inclusion of higher quality GItools in guidelines is needed to support user adoption of guidelines. The GItool framework can serve as the basis for evaluating and adapting existing GItools, or developing new GItools. Further research is needed to validate the framework, develop and implement instruments by which developers can apply the framework, and specify which guidelines should be accompanied by GItools.

Keywords:

Guidelines; Implementation

Copyright © (2014) Gagliardi, Anna R. et al. Abstract reprinted by AIR in compliance with the BioMed Central Open Access Charter at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/policies/license-agreement.

WEB URI:

http://www.implementationscience.com/content/9/1/98

Type of Item: Implementation Instrument
Type of KT Strategy: Survey
Target Group: Researchers
Evidence Level: 3
Record Updated:2017-02-17