Search Database

KT Strategies - Search Results

You searched for records matching:

1. Citation: Shearer, J.C., Dion, M., & Lavis, J.,N. (2014). Exchanging and using research evidence in health policy networks: a statistical network analysis. Implementation Science, 9, 126. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0126-8.
Title: Exchanging and using research evidence in health policy networks: a statistical network analysis
Author(s): Shearer, J.C.
Dion, M.
Lavis, J.N.
Year: 2014
Journal/Publication: Implementation Science
Abstract: Background: Evidence-informed health policymaking is a goal of equitable and effective health systems but occurs infrequently in reality. Past research points to the facilitating role of interpersonal relationships between policy-makers and researchers, imploring the adoption of a social network lens. This study aims to identify network-level factors associated with the exchange and use of research evidence in policymaking.

Methods: Data on social networks and research use were collected from seventy policy actors across three health policy cases in Burkina Faso (child health, malaria, and HIV). Networks were graphed for actors ’ interactions, their provision of, and request for research evidence. Exponential random graph models estimated the probability of evidence provision and request between actors, controlling for network- and individual-level covariates. Logistic regression models estimated actors ’ use of research evidence to inform policy.

Results: Network structure explained more than half of the evidence exchanges (ties) observed in these networks. Across all cases, a pair of actors was more likely to form a provision tie if they already had a request tie between them and visa versa ( θ =6.16, p <0.05; θ =2.87, p <0.05; θ =2.31, p < 0.05). The child health network displayed clustering tendencies, meaning that actors were more likely to form ties if they shared an acquaintance ( θ =2.36, p <0.05). Actors ’ use of research evidence was positively associated with their centrality ( i.e. , connectedness).

Conclusions: The exchange and use of research evidence in policymaking can be partly explained by the structure of actors ’ networks of relationships. Efforts to support knowledge translation and evidence-informed policymaking should consider network factors.

Keywords: Evidence-informed health policy, Knowledge translation, Social network analysis, Exponential random graph model, Policy network
WEB URI:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s13012-014-0126-8.pdf

Type of Item: Research Study
Type of KT Strategy: Social Network Analysis
Target Group: Healthcare Professional
Policymaker/Legislator
Researchers
Evidence Level: 3
Record Updated:2014-11-18
 

Home or Search again

American Institutes for Research (AIR) logo
About AIR | AIR Topics | Contact AIR
Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research (KTDRR)
© 2019 American Institutes for Research (AIR).

The contents of this site were developed under grant number 90DPKT0001 from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.


the National Institute on Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research logo