Search Database

KT Strategies - Search Results

You searched for records matching:

1. Citation: Giguere, A., Labrecque, M., Haynes, R., Grad, R., Pluye, P., Legare, F., Cauchon, M., Greenway, M., & Carmichael, P. (2014). Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: A mixed methods implementation study. Implementation Science, 9, 144.
Title: Evidence summaries (decision boxes) to prepare clinicians for shared decision-making with patients: a mixed methods implementation study
Author(s): Giguere, A.
Labrecque, M.
Haynes, R.
Grad, R.
Pluye, P.
Legare, F.
Cauchon, M.
Greenway, M.
Carmichael, P.
Year: 2014
Journal/Publication: Implementation Science
Abstract:

Background

Decision boxes (Dboxes) provide clinicians with research evidence about management options for medical questions that have no single best answer. Dboxes fulfil a need for rapid clinical training tools to prepare clinicians for clinician-patient communication and shared decision-making. We studied the barriers and facilitators to using the Dbox information in clinical practice.

Methods

We used a mixed methods study with sequential explanatory design. We recruited family physicians, residents, and nurses from six primary health-care clinics. Participants received eight Dboxes covering various questions by email (one per week). For each Dbox, they completed a web questionnaire to rate clinical relevance and cognitive impact and to assess the determinants of their intention to use what they learned from the Dbox to explain to their patients the advantages and disadvantages of the options, based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Following the 8-week delivery period, we conducted focus groups with clinicians and interviews with clinic administrators to explore contextual factors influencing the use of the Dbox information.

Results

One hundred clinicians completed the web surveys. In 54% of the 496 questionnaires completed, they reported that their practice would be improved after having read the Dboxes, and in 40%, they stated that they would use this information for their patients. Of those who would use the information for their patients, 89% expected it would benefit their patients, especially in that it would allow the patient to make a decision more in keeping with his/her personal circumstances, values, and preferences. They intended to use the Dboxes in practice (mean 5.6 ± 1.2, scale 1–7, with 7 being “high”), and their intention was significantly related to social norm, perceived behavioural control, and attitude according to the TPB (P < 0.0001). In focus groups, clinicians mentioned that co-interventions such as patient decision aids and training in shared decision-making would facilitate the use of the Dbox information. Some participants would have liked a clear “bottom line” statement for each Dbox and access to printed Dboxes in consultation rooms.

Conclusions

Dboxes are valued by clinicians. Tailoring of Dboxes to their needs would facilitate their implementation in practice.

Keywords:

Clinical practice guidelines; Knowledge translation; Decision support; Evidence-based practice; Barriers; Patient-centred care; User experience; Continuing professional development; Communication competency

Copyright © (2014) Giguere, A. et al. Abstract reprinted by AIR in compliance with the BioMed Central Open Access Charter at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/policies/license-agreement.

WEB URI:

http://www.implementationscience.com/content/9/1/144

http://www.implementationscience.com/content/pdf/s13012-014-0144-6.pdf

Type of Item: Research Study
Type of KT Strategy: Decision Aids
Target Group: Decision Maker
Healthcare Professional
Evidence Level: 3
Record Updated:2017-02-17
 

Home or Search again

American Institutes for Research (AIR) logo
About AIR | AIR Topics | Contact AIR
Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research (KTDRR)
© 2019 American Institutes for Research (AIR).

The contents of this site were developed under grant number 90DPKT0001 from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.


the National Institute on Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research logo