Search Database

KT Strategies - Search Results

You searched for records matching:

1. Citation:

Talbott, E., Maggin, D. M., & Van Acker, E. Y., & Kumm, S. (2017). Quality indicators for reviews of research in special education. Exceptionality, 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1283625 

Title: Quality Indicators for Reviews of Research in Special Education
Author(s): Elizabeth Talbott
Daniel M. Maggin
Eryn Y. Van Acker
Skip Kumm
Year: 2017
Journal/Publication: Exceptionality
Abstract: Reviews of research in special education have a unique place in the scientific literature, with the potential to inform a broad audience about the effectiveness and acceptability of assessment and intervention strategies for a heterogeneous group of children and youth. Results from reviews are useful to school leaders, practitioners, parents, policymakers, grant funders, researchers, journal editors, and reviewers. Despite an international movement toward the implementation of evidence-based practices, which includes quality indicators for reviews of research, the field of special education has not yet embraced its own set of review indicators. In this manuscript, we make the case for and propose a set of quality indicators for special education, with the goal of making all reviews in the field trustworthy, transparent, and systematic. Attaining a high level of quality in research reviews will then help researchers guide consumers to select the most effective interventions for youth with disabilities.
Research in special education can appeal to a broad audience, including practitioners, parents, policymakers, grant funders, researchers, journal editors, and reviewers (Cooper & Hedges 2009). Each of these constituents employs wisdom and experience, often through conversations with influential members of their social networks, to interpret findings from research and make sound decisions in selecting, implementing, and communicating effective assessment and intervention strategies (Daly, 2010Kavale, 2001). Constituents benefit from rigorous reviews that assist them in becoming wiser, better consumers of research. It is the responsibility of special education researchers to combine and communicate the results of our work to this diverse group of constituents. An essential first step in doing so is to conduct a broad range of clearly reported, objective, and transparent reviews of research with a set of quality indicators. Despite the emphasis in recent years on developing and disseminating discipline-specific quality indicators for a wide range of research designs (e.g., Moeller, Dattilo, & Rusch, 2015; Trainor & Graue, 2014), there remain none for systematic reviews, arguably the most important vehicle for describing and disseminating research findings in special education.
WEB URI:

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09362835.2017.1283625?scroll=top&needAccess=true

Type of Item: Evaluation Instrument
Type of KT Strategy: Continuous Quality Improvement/Total Quality Management
Systematic Review Synthesis/Framework
Target Group: Educator
Researchers
Evidence Level: 3
Record Updated:2017-08-02
 

Home or Search again

American Institutes for Research (AIR) logo
About AIR | AIR Topics | Contact AIR
Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research (KTDRR)
© 2019 American Institutes for Research (AIR).

The contents of this site were developed under grant number 90DPKT0001 from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.


the National Institute on Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research logo